SCIENTIFIC CURE OF SPIRITUAL DISEASE:
YOUR STUDY OF DHAMMA
BY Buddhadasa Bhikkhu

To
begin, I would like to express my joy that you have come here to study
Dhamma (Natural Truth). Second, I would like to thank each of you for
helping to make Suan Mokkh a useful and worthwhile place.
Today, I would like to talk with you concerning the question:
What benefits will we receive from studying Dhamma? If you get any
benefits from Buddhism, you will become a Buddhist automatically,
whether or not you go through a conversion ceremony. To convert or not
to convert is a meaningless issue. The relevant issue, the important
thing, is whether you will get anything useful from Buddhism.
So we will talk about the things that you will gain from
Buddhism. Only after realizing that Buddhism has benefited you will you
know what Buddhism is about. Until you understand what it is that you
have received, you can't really know anything about Buddhism. Let's
discuss, then, the things that you will obtain from Buddhism. Thus, you
will understand Buddhism and will become a Buddhist automatically.
I would like to say that you will get the best, the highest
thing that a human being ought to get. There is nothing more worth
getting than this; it surpasses everything. We might call this thing,
simply, "New Life." The best thing to do here is to talk about the
characteristics of New Life.
Now, for you to understand what is going to be said, I ask you
to forget everything. Please forget all the faiths, creeds, and beliefs
which you have ever held. Put them all aside for the time being. Even if
you prefer to believe in scientific principles more than any of the
so-called religions, leave them completely alone for now. Make the mind
empty, free, and spotless, so that you can hear something new. Actually,
Buddhism shares many characteristics and principles with science, but
Buddhism is a science of the mind-heart rather than a science of
physical things.1 Buddhism is a spiritual science. For this reason, it may be something new for you.
Dhamma Medicine
The first thing we would like you to realize is that Buddhism,
or Dhamma, is a medicine for curing disease. This is a strange and
special medicine because it can be taken by anyone, regardless of
religion, nationality, ethnic background, education, class, or language.
Anyone may use this medicine, for Dhamma is like those modern drugs
that cure physical ailments. Such drugs can be taken by people all over
the world, no matter what their religion, race, sex, profession, or
language. Although we come from different cultures, we can use the very
same kind of medicine. Take aspirin, for example. No matter who and
where we are, we can take a few aspirin to get rid of a headache. Dhamma
is the same. It is the universal medicine.
We like to say that Dhamma is a medicine for disease or roga. I would like for us to use this Pali word "roga," because it has a clear and useful meaning. Although it's usually translated as "disease," roga
literally means "that which pierces and stabs," thus causing pain. We
don't really know where the English word "disease" comes from, so we
prefer "roga." Its meaning is certain and appropriate: stabbing,
piercing, skewering. Dhamma is something that can cure this stabbing and
piercing of roga.
The roga with which we're most concerned is spiritual. We can
call it "spiritual disease." Physical disease pierces the body;
spiritual disease stabs the mind or spirit. Dhamma is the latter's
remedy. If we have no spiritual disease, to come and study Dhamma is a
complete waste of time. Hence, everyone must look closely in order to
know both kinds of roga: physical disease, roga of the body, and
spiritual disease, roga of the mind, heart, or spirit. Then, look within
yourselves -- right now! -- is there any spiritual disease in you? Are
you free from disease or merely enduring it?
We begin our study of Dhamma by getting to know our own roga.
You must look and search within yourself until seeing and discovering
how spiritual disease afflicts you. To do so, you must look inside! If
you don't, you won't have a proper beginning to your study of Dhamma.
Unless we understand the roga from which we suffer, we will only study
Dhamma in a foolish, aimless way. Actually, most of you already have
some knowledge about your spiritual disease, but for most that knowledge
will be slight, scattered, or unclear.
Let's talk about the disease a bit more in order to clarify it.
All of the problems which disturb the mind are problems which arise from
aging, illness, and death. These are the first symptoms of the disease.
Our minds are disturbed and pestered by problems that result from the
fact that we all must grow old, fall sick, and die. These problems are
the first thing to look at. Next, there are three general, miscellaneous
problems: we get separated from the things we love, we experience
things we dislike, and we have wishes which go unfulfilled. These are
general problems leading to spiritual disease. Before anything else,
each of you must know these problems or roga as you actually experience
them within yourselves.
LOOK WITHIN
This is why there is the principle that Dhamma must be studied
and learned internally, rather than externally. We must learn from life
itself. Learn from all the things that you experience within this
fathom-long body. Please be certain to learn inside only, and don't
bother learning outside. The things that we learn from external sources,
such as books and talks, are never enough. Only by looking within can
we come to understand these spiritual diseases completely. The external
kind of study and learning, such as reading books, discussion, and
listening to talks as you are doing now, can do no more than explain the
method and means of inner study. This external study only learns how to
go about the inner study. Then, you must go and do that inner study in
order to understand Dhamma.
I ask all of you to begin your studies from within by studying
the problems that you inwardly experience. Please take a look at the
problems that arise from aging, sickness, and death. We are afraid of
aging, sickness and death; all kinds of problems on many different
levels arise from them. We must clearly observe these things in the same
way that a geologist examines a rock, as when we take up something with
our own hand, hold it up to the light, and carefully examine it until
we see it clearly in all its detail. In the same way, we must see
clearly the problems that arise from our own aging, illness, and death.
Further, we must investigate the problems which develop out of them,
such as being separated from beloved things, meeting with unloved
things, and desiring things and then not getting them.
The result of all of the above problems is dukkha (pain), both
physical and mental. The symptoms and conditions of dukkha are many and
varied. It comes in many forms: sorrow, sadness, dissatisfaction, grief,
lamentation, tears, frustration, pain, misery, agony, and more. There
are Pali terms for all of these, but what we call them isn't important.
We needn't know all of their names, yet we ought to know how these
things really feel when we experience them. To begin with, you must know
them inside yourselves. All of these are roga, the symptoms of roga,
and the results of the roga which we have caught.
Dhamma is the medicine for roga, spiritual disease;
thus, the matter we're discussing here is a matter of the mind and
spirit. The Buddha was one who came to know this disease, found a cure
for it, and used the cure in order to free himself from disease. After
doing so, the Buddha was then able to teach us about the roga, its cure,
and the way to administer the cure. Please understand the Lord Buddha
in this way. If you are afflicted by spiritual disease, you ought to be
interested in his Dhamma.2
However, if any one of you is completely free of spiritual disease, you
are wasting time on Dhamma -- you can go home. I repeat, anyone who has
no spiritual disease is invited to leave.
DEVELOPING THE CURE
Now, let's talk about studying Dhamma, which is the medicine
that cures spiritual disease. There are many stages and levels to
Dhamma. We begin by studying, as we do with any ordinary subject.3
Maybe we have no real understanding of Dhamma at the start. Although we
have read many books and listened to talks, we don't really know
Dhamma. We study in order to know, then we have knowledge. Once we have
some knowledge, it must be used. In short, for it to be worthwhile, we
must know Dhamma, until having Dhamma, and then use Dhamma.
Let's go through these three things again. Even though we may
have read about and studied Dhamma a great deal, although we may have
much knowledge of it, we may not have the right kind of knowledge. This
means we don't really have Dhamma. If it isn't the correct knowledge, we
won't be able to use it. Thus, we need to study until we have a
sufficient amount of the right knowledge. Otherwise we won't be able to
use it. Please investigate this fact thoroughly. Therefore, we must have
Dhamma, we must have correct and sufficient understanding of Dhamma.
But having the right knowledge isn't enough, we must have a sufficiently
large amount of this correct knowledge and it must be very quick. If it
isn't quick, it is never on time and in the place where it is needed.
We must be agile and expert in the use of Dhamma.
Simply having this knowledge somewhere in the back of our minds
doesn't cure the spiritual disease. We must be expert in it; we need to
be very skillful in its proper use. We need to be deft, agile, and
expert, so that we are able to understand the spiritual disease that is
already present, as well as any new spiritual disease that may arise. If
we have this understanding, it is a good start in becoming able to use
Dhamma to cure our disease. So study the disease within yourselves. This
is the kind of knowledge that you must develop.
JUST ONE TEACHING
You must know that the Buddha spoke of just one thing and
nothing else: dukkha (pain, dissatisfaction) and the quenching of
dukkha. The Buddha taught only the disease and the cure of the disease;
he didn't talk about anything else. When people asked questions about
other matters, the Buddha refused to waste his or their time with such
things. Nowadays, we spend our time studying all kinds of other things.
It's a pity how our curiosity is aroused by matters such as: After
death, will I be born again? Where will I be reborn? How will it happen?
Please don't waste your time on those things. Instead of reading lots
of books, take what time you have to focus on dukkha and the complete,
utter quenching of dukkha. This is the knowledge to store up, this is
the studying to do. Don't bother studying anything else!
The Lord Buddha taught only dukkha and the total cessation of
dukkha. He taught that we must study these two things within our bodies.
You can only do this while the body is alive. Once the body dies, you
don't have to concern yourselves with this problem any more. But now,
while there's life, constantly, continuously, and inwardly study dukkha
(spiritual disease) and the utter quenching of dukkha (the cure of the
spiritual disease).
Throughout this world there is little interest in this matter of
dukkha and its end. None of the world's schools pay any attention to
it. In the universities, they don't teach or study it. The only thing
taught in our schools and universities is cleverness, the storing up of
many facts and the ability to perform mental tricks with them. Students
graduate with cleverness and some way to make a living. This is what
modern education means-- being clever and earning lots of money. Dukkha
and the quenching of dukkha are totally ignored. We believe that all
education in today's world is incomplete. It is imperfect because the
most important subjects are forgotten; a general base of knowledge and
the ability to earn a living are not enough. There is a third area of
knowledge which the schools and universities don't teach: how to be a
human being. Why do they ignore what it takes to be a proper human
being, that is, a human being free of dukkha? Because a proper human
being ought to have no spiritual disease, modern education will be
incomplete and insufficient as long as it fails to cure spiritual
disease.
WHAT ARE HUMAN BEINGS?
It is correct and proper that each of you has come here to
undertake the third kind of education: how to be a human being without
any problems, how to be free of dukkha. It is good that you have come
here and are interested in this topic. In short, use this opportunity to
learn what it takes to be a human being.
If someone tells you that you're not yet human, please don't get
angry and please don't feel sad. First, you must look and see what it
means to be human. So let's take a look at "manusaya," the Pali word for
human being. This is a very good word for it has a very useful meaning.
manusaya means "lofty-minded one," a mind high enough to be above all
problems. Problems are like flood waters, but they can't flood the lofty
mind. When one's mind is elevated to a high level, then we can say that
one is a manusaya. The speaker isn't sure where the English word "human
being" comes from. Our guess is that it must mean "high-minded," also.
"Man" is probably related to mana (mind) and "hu" ought to mean "high."
So, human ought to mean "high-minded."
As things are, Dhamma is the knowledge which tells us exactly
what it means to be human. We're interested in what it is to be fully
human, rather than merely masquerading in "human" bodies. To be truly
human is to be above all problems. Study and learn in order to be
completely human. Study, practice, and work to develop a mind, heart and
spirit that is above all problems. By problems, we mean dukkha, the
thing which, if it arises, we cannot tolerate or endure. When it occurs,
we can't stand it and struggle to get away from it. This causes
agitation, discomfort, unhappiness, and unhealthiness. Dukkha, our
problem, means "unbearableness, intolerableness." We can't stand it, we
can't put up with it."
Once again, let me repeat that if you have no problems you can
go home. You need not waste your time studying Dhamma. However, if you
happen to have some problems, just one little problem, or perhaps many,
then take a good look at them. Stick around and learn how to look at
problems.
I dare say that every one of you has a problem, and further,
that you all have the same problem. This one problem that bothers us all
is the thing we discussed above. It is the problem that arises out of
aging, illness, and death. In short, we don't get the things that we
want. We can't maintain this body forever. Life is never exactly what we
want it to be, we can't have things our way all of the time. This
problem is shared by each and every one of us.
SCIENTIFIC APPROACH
We are all in a situation where we must use a scientific method
to solve our problem. We must use a specifically scientific approach,
because the methods of philosophy and logic can't solve the problem.4
There are myriad philosophies concerning everything imaginable, but
none of them can solve our problem. Philosophies are very popular with
people in today's world, they are fun and interesting, but they don't
work. This is why we must turn to a scientific method which can and will
solve the problem.
It is now time to recall something about which you've probably already heard: the four noble truths (ariya-sacca).
Please reflect upon this most important matter. The four noble truths
are Buddhism's scientific principle of the mind. The four noble truths
allow us to study the specific problem exactly as it is, without relying
on any hypothesis. Most of you are familiar with the standard
scientific method in which a hypothesis is proposed, then tested through
experimentation. Such hypotheses are merely forms of guessing and
estimation. With the ariya-sacca such clumsiness isn't necessary.
Reality is experienced and examined directly, rather than through the
limitations of hypothesis, predictions, and guestimations.
What, then, are the four noble truths that you must look into? They are:
1) dukkha; 2) the cause of dukkha; 3) the quenching of dukkha,
through quenching its cause; 4) there is a way or path that quenches
dukkha by ending its cause.
These are the ariya-sacca. They have the features of science,
the reasoning of science, and the methodology of science. In short, we
apply these truths to real things as they actually happen in life,
without using any hypotheses.
Merely reading books won't enable you to do this science. Books
lead to more hypotheses, ideas, and opinions. Even in a book about
Buddhism, the four noble truths become just more hypotheses. Such is not
science, it is only philosophy, which is always inviting us to play
around with hypotheses. So we often get stuck in endless circles of
suppositions, propositions, and arguments. There is no true Dhamma in
that, there is no reality of actually quenched dukkha.
THE REAL THING
If we want to be scientific about it, practice with the real
thing and forget the hypotheses. Study the real thing itself: study
dukkha as you experience it. Look at the cause of dukkha by experiencing
that cause. Observe through direct personal experience the other side
of the coin -- the end of dukkha. Lastly, investigate what you must do
to end dukkha. This way is scientific. For as long as you aren't doing
this, you're doing philosophy. You'll only have a philosophical
Buddhism. Don't get stuck in theories. Look inside, study inside
yourselves, see these truths as they actually happen. Just playing
around with ideas about Buddhism, you will never find the real thing.
If you study Buddhism from books only, no matter what your
sources, or how you study, in the end you'll always come away with the
feeling that Buddhism is a philosophy. This is because the authors of
most books on Buddhism approach it as a philosophy. They actually
believe that Buddhism is a philosophy, which is totally wrong.
FORGET ABOUT PHILOSOPHY
This idea that Buddhism is a philosophy, put it aside, lock it
up in a drawer, in order to practice by studying directly in the mind,
as they happen, dukkha, the cause of dukkha, the end of dukkha, and the
way that leads to the end of dukkha. Study these until you experience
the quenching of some dukkha. As soon as you experience this, you'll
know that Buddhism is no philosophy.
You will know instantly that Buddhism is a science. It has the
structure, principles, and spirit of science, not of philosophy. At the
same time, you'll see that it is a religion, one with its own particular
character, that is, a religion entirely compatible with modern science.
Everything that is truly understood by science is acceptable to
Buddhism, the religion which is a science of the mind and spirit. Please
understand Buddhism in this way.
You may be one of the many who believe that a religion must have
a God and that without a God it isn't a religion. Most people believe
that a religion must have at least one God, if not many. Such
understanding is not correct. A wiser view is that there are two kinds
of religion: theistic and non-theistic. Theistic religions postulate a
God as the highest thing and belief in that God is all-important.
Consider Buddhism to be non-theistic, for it doesn't postulate any
belief in a personal God. Buddhism, however, has an impersonal God, that
is the Truth (sacca) of Nature according to scientific
principles. This Truth is the highest thing in Buddhism, equivalent to
the God or gods of theistic religions.
You should study the word "religion," it doesn't mean "to
believe in God." If you look up this word in a good dictionary, you'll
see that it comes from the Latin religare, which means "to observe and
to bind with the Supreme Thing." Ancient grammarians once thought that
religare came from the root lig, to observe. Thus, religion was "a
system of observance that led to the final goal of humanity." Later
scholars considered that it came from the root leg, to bind. Then,
religion became "the thing that binds human beings to the Supreme Thing
(God)." Finally, both meanings were combined and religion was understood
to be "the system of observance (practice) that binds human beings to
the Supreme Thing." The Supreme Thing needn't be called "God." If,
however, you insist on calling it "God," then recognize that "God" must
have two meanings: personal God and impersonal God.
THE BUDDHIST GOD
If you prefer to call it "God," you should understand that
Buddhism has the law of nature as its God. The Law of Nature -- for
example, the law of idappaccayata, which is the law of causality and
conditionality -- is the Buddhist God. idappaccayata means:
With this as condition, this is; Because this arises, this
arises. Without this as condition, this is not; Because this ceases,
this ceases.5
This is the Supreme Thing in Buddhism; this Law of Nature is the
Buddhist God. In Buddhism there isn't a personal God; its God -- the
Law of Nature -- is an impersonal God. Because Buddhism, in fact, has a
God, it is a religion.
Many Western writers and scholars of Buddhism say that it isn't a
religion, since it has no God. They make a terrible blunder, because
they don't know anything about the impersonal God. If they knew it, they
would see that it is more real and true than any personal God. Then,
they wouldn't write that Buddhism isn't a religion. They would write
that Buddhism is another kind of religion. Religions with personal gods
are one kind of religion, but Buddhism is the other kind, the kind that
has an impersonal God.
Most religions believe in a Creator, usually an individualistic
God with a personality. The Buddhist Creator is impersonal. This
impersonal God, the Law of Dhamma or Nature, is the law of
idappaccayata:
Because this is, so this is. Because this is, thus this is. Because this is, so this is.
This is the law of causality, the natural evolutionary process
of this causing this which in turn causes this and so on in endless
concocting. Buddhism has a Creator, but it is the impersonal God. If you
are able to understand the difference between these two kinds of Gods
-- impersonal law of causality and personal Creator -- it will be easy
for you to realize what Buddhism is.
When things happen in this way, you'll realize that this matter
of dukkha and its quenching happen according to the law of the
impersonal God. Then, you'll understand Dhamma correctly and live in
harmony with Dhamma. You'll see it as science rather than mere
philosophy. The distinction between science and philosophy will ensure
that your study of Buddhism is correct and in line with Dhamma.
If you have this knowledge and use it, you have the medicine for
curing spiritual disease. By taking this medicine, the heart is
emancipated; it is saved, that is, freed from all dukkha. Every religion
teaches emancipation, but only Buddhism teaches freedom from all
problems, from all of the problems discussed above. Thus, there is no
problem or dukkha to dominate us; this is called "emancipation." We have
been cured of all the diseases discussed above.
I hope that you understand the general principles, the meaning,
and the genuine goal of Buddhism. If you do, you'll steadily solve your
problems, because your understanding will be correct from the start.
If you understand what has been said, you will proceed smoothly
in the study and cure of spiritual disease. As time has run out, more
details must wait until the next talk. Before closing, I would like to
express my joy at the right action of all of you who have come to work
on this problem of spiritual disease.
And, once again, I thank you for helping to make Suan Mokkh a useful place.
Endnotes
1. In Buddhist terminology, there is no real
distinction made between the heart and the mind. The intellect and the
emotions are not seen as being polar opposites. Rather, it is all citta,
which can be translated "mind," "heart," or "mind-heart." We use these
three terms as synonyms.
2. Here, Dhamma is both Natural Truth and the knowledge of Natural Truth which enables us to end the disease, that is, dukkha.
3. Here, study is not just intellectual
learning. It involves thinking, investigation, training,
experimentation, and direct experience, with emphasis on the training
and experience.
4. Ajarn Buddhadasa makes a clear distinction
between philosophy and science, as he understands the two terms. The
former is mere speculation devoid of practical application, while the
latter can be directly experienced and personally verified through
practice.
5. Some translators render these lines "this
... that ...," but the Pali original explicitly repeats "this ... this
...." We leave it to the reader to reflect why.
The best way from http://www.suanmokkh.org/archive
http://www.buddhadasa.com